Nördnytt! 🤓Amazon Ring's lost dog ad sparks backlash amid fears of mass surveillance
- mjr00 - 12343 sekunder sedanThe Dark Knight was released in 2008. In that movie, Batman hijacks citizens' cellphones to track down the Joker, and it's presented as a major moral and ethical dilemma as part of the movie's overall themes. The only way Batman remains a "good guy" in the eyes of the audience is by destroying the entire thing once he's done.
Crazy to think that less than two decades later, an even more powerful surveillance technology is being advertised at the Super Bowl as a great and wonderful thing and you should totally volunteer to upload your Ring footage so it can be analyzed for tracking down the Jok... I mean illegal imm... I mean lost pets.
- text0404 - 12579 sekunder sedanEven more concerning is that Ring is partnering with Flock [1], which has been the subject of quite a bit of controversy recently [2][3][4], with the CEO lashing out at critics with inflammatory language [5][6].
[1] https://www.flocksafety.com/blog/flock-safety-and-ring-partn...
[2] https://www.aclu.org/news/privacy-technology/flock-roundup
[3] https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/feb/10/ice-school-c...
[4] https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2025/12/effs-investigations-ex...
[5] https://www.aclu.org/news/privacy-technology/flock-ceo-goes-...
- pibaker - 7007 sekunder sedanThere would be less backlash to the Ring ad if the ad was honest about how people actually use it. Show us porch pirates, burglars and stupid neighbor who backs into your car being caught on camera.
But instead, they have to come up with something "wholesome" like finding your lost doggo. The wholesomeness is so forced and cringe that it makes you think they have something to hide. It almost feels like the people who wrote this ad and the people who greenlit it knew something was wrong so they have to come up with a cover story. But like a child smiling at you with his biggest smile while anxiously keeping his hands behind his back, it only makes them more suspicious especially in a time when big tech feels more and more like an adversary than a friend.
- Animats - 6634 sekunder sedanThey don't have a lost-kid feature?
In China, kids are accustomed to face recognition early.[1] The kids are checking into school via fare gates with face recognition. Here's an ad for Hikvision surveillance systems showing the whole system.[2] Hikvision has a whole series of videos presenting their concept of a kindly, gentler Big Brother. This is probably the most amusing.[3]
Amazon's concept is in some ways more powerful. They don't need full coverage. Just sparse, but widespread coverage. Anything that moves around will pass through the view of cameras at some point. Suspicious behavior can be detected in the back end cloud processing, which improves over time.
Flock has the same concept. Flock coverage is sparse in terms of area, but widespread.
"1984" was so last cen.
[1] https://www.youtube.com/shorts/SMKG8aLTJ38
- davidw - 14029 sekunder sedanThe WeRateDogs guy broke character and put out a video attacking that ad
- LightBug1 - 110 sekunder sedanMFST ...
Move Fast and Stasi Things ...
- jedberg - 16074 sekunder sedanAmazon also had the ad about Alexa killing you. Not sure what they were thinking exactly.
- apparent - 2579 sekunder sedanThe situation with the Nancy Guthrie disappearance and Nest camera footage is related, and interesting. It seems that she had a Nest doorbell camera, but didn't pay for the subscription plan ($100/yr?). As a result, the camera records short snippets but doesn't save them to the cloud in a user-accessible way.
After a week, Google finally hunted down/coughed up the footage. I imagine there were some people within Google who realized that if they provided the footage immediately, then it could discourage people from paying for the subscription.
Of course, they must also realize that by not providing the footage sooner, they may have allowed the perp to get away, or the victim to be killed.
- isametry - 4814 sekunder sedanThe Circle (2017) is by no means a perfect movie, based on a 2013 book which I’m told is only marginally better.
But it did do a surprisingly accurate job of depicting pretty much this exact scenario, 9 (13) years in advance.
As in: sleek FAANG holds a grand showcase of mass surveillance using its ubiquitous user-installed smart cameras, under the guise of a good cause.
https://youtube.com/watch?v=Mro9RCAhvE4
(The fictional story is slightly more blunt about it, the good cause being finding wanted persons, rather than lost dogs).
- ibejoeb - 958 sekunder sedanIt's so overt that I wouldn't blame you for thinking that they don't care and that they want you to know.
- gentleman11 - 14107 sekunder sedanFears of mass surveillance? It's already mass surveillance
- foxfired - 7221 sekunder sedanThere’s no need to fear the construction of mass surveillance anymore. It’s already here. We built it one convenience at a time [0]. When I see all my friends with Alexa devices at home, ring cameras, and a million food apps on their phones, it feels like it’s already too late.
[0]: https://idiallo.com/blog/we-have-all-we-need-for-mass-survei...
- blibble - 12753 sekunder sedanthat advert is just so horribly manipulative it's borderline evil
how can normal people go to work and produce this output?
(I suppose everyone that is prepared to work at Amazon corporate is... a certain type of person)
- CrzyLngPwd - 3833 sekunder sedanA mobile phone is the surveillance dictators' wet dream.
What are my subjects doing...tap tap tap...ah there they are. Oh him, he needs to be cancelled, he isn't where I wanted him to be.
- kmoser - 4709 sekunder sedanEven if it can and will only be used to track dogs, that means if I have a photo of someone's dog I can track it and learn that the owner is (likely) away from their house.
- wolvoleo - 13624 sekunder sedanhttps://archive.is/J7KGU
Archive link posted because in some cases (not all, strange enough) there's a paywall ("subscribe to continue reading")
- manicennui - 6203 sekunder sedanDid they not realize that it is already a mass surveillance network?
- Archelaos - 13776 sekunder sedanWhat exactly are the "neighborhood cameras" mentioned in the article?
- dev_l1x_be - 6810 sekunder sedanAre you a dog?? No?? So you do not have anything to worry about!!
So they say.
- gbolcer - 7898 sekunder sedanYeah in a world where if you post a Ring video of someone taking a crowbar to your mailbox which gets a strike in your neighborhood group and the video down for "hate", yeah, as useful as it is, the mass surveillance stuff is pretty alarming.
- an-allen - 7024 sekunder sedanThe fears of mass surveillance are some of the funniest things I can think of. Do you think a tree grows a leaf and then says I don’t care what you do leaf.
- crooked-v - 12967 sekunder sedanThat ad gave me a visceral shudder of revulsion, not so much for the specific functionality on display as for the timing, which absolutely could not have been accidental. They might as well have just put 'and we're working on automatic alerts for ICE!' in the ad.
- teaearlgraycold - 3488 sekunder sedanJust airtag your dog? Jesus Christ.
- xyst - 4031 sekunder sedanA country ruled by fear has their "security" systems turned on themselves. We truly live in an Orwellian dystopia
- jimt1234 - 4384 sekunder sedanI thought Ring was already sending data to law enforcement agencies (that paid Amazon for it). Also, I thought the EULA included language that basically said, "All your data are belong to us", so they could already do whatever surveillance they want.
- nullbyte - 11052 sekunder sedanI'm afraid that ship has sailed
- 1970-01-01 - 14239 sekunder sedanWhat backlash? "People voiced concerns" turns out to be 9 people if you follow the link. Where exactly is this backlash and why can't I smell it?
- damnesian - 7396 sekunder sedanKnow what is super easy to do? Not buy Amazon Ring products.
- ChrisArchitect - 11638 sekunder sedan[dupe] Discussion: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46950915
- russellbeattie - 6247 sekunder sedanAmazon marketing broke a fundamental rule about consumer tech: Don't remind users about how much Big Tech knows about you.
Your various devices track everywhere you go, who you communicate with, what you search for, what you buy, what audio you listen to, what videos you watch, what games you play, who your family is, all your pictures and video you take, who comes and goes from your house, when you sleep, your health data, and much more.
And as a fundamental part of Big Tech's business they accumulate, aggregate and analyze all that information in various ways to increase profits. They don't keep this a secret, but wisely they normally don't brag about it to the general public.
Consumers have shown that are totally willing to give up privacy for convenience. Just don't remind them of it.
- RcouF1uZ4gsC - 6590 sekunder sedanI think Nancy Guthrie and the release of the doorbell video by scouring Google’s caches has done far, far more to make people want video cameras and cloud storage than any ad.
- josefritzishere - 9896 sekunder sedanAmazon has a very bad track record in this area. https://www.opensocietyfoundations.org/voices/amazon-is-wagi...
- Gagarin1917 - 10498 sekunder sedanBullshit. The only people worried are the ones that were already concerned and never bought a Ring.
I guarantee the vast majority of people LOVE this new feature.
- bradley13 - 8679 sekunder sedanRecording public spaces should be illegal. Public street? Public sidewalk? Not your turf, no cameras, no recording.