The Om Programming Language
www.om-language.com - 234 poäng - 51 kommentarer - 33938 sekunder sedan
Kommentarer (11)
- pgt - 26364 sekunder sedanWould recommend placing example language syntax above the fold. Was tough to have to scroll halfway down the entire site to see any syntax. Nobody cares about the EBNF syntax until they have a feel for the language.
- dirk94018 - 11892 sekunder sedanAren't LLMs supposed to write machine code directly, no more programming languages at all, any day now? Joking aside, programming languages are a good mental exercise. Forth was my first language after assembly. Didn't like the stack juggling and ended up using its macro assembler more and more, it became something else, conventions over code I suppose, like what to keep in registers. Forth (and Unix) got the composability requirement right, the testing of individual units.
- willquack - 28250 sekunder sedanI worked with Jason (creator of Om) at my last job. He's awesome!
- irickt - 30123 sekunder sedanA more explanatory article mentioned in the post: https://evincarofautumn.blogspot.com/2012/02/why-concatenati...
- omoikane - 27480 sekunder sedan> any UTF-8 text (without byte-order marker) defines a valid Om program.
What is the behavior of a program with unmatched braces? I am not sure a stray `}` would fit any of the defined syntax.
- sriku - 11802 sekunder sedanAnother concatenative-ish one embedded in js .. just for fun - https://github.com/srikumarks/pjs
You may find the "genailang" module fun to play with.
- shevy-java - 11585 sekunder sedanMissing a 'g'!
Omg would have a ring to it.
- bittermandel - 28961 sekunder sedanI confused this with https://github.com/omcljs/om
- maximgeorge - 20028 sekunder sedan[dead]
- esafak - 29417 sekunder sedan[flagged]
- jwilber - 28521 sekunder sedanWill never not complain about languages not giving code examples. It’s like writing a charting/UI/style library and showing no examples. Just what?
Nördnytt! 🤓