The Om Programming Language

Would recommend placing example language syntax above the fold. Was tough to have to scroll halfway down the entire site to see any syntax. Nobody cares about the EBNF syntax until they have a feel for the language.

Aren't LLMs supposed to write machine code directly, no more programming languages at all, any day now? Joking aside, programming languages are a good mental exercise. Forth was my first language after assembly. Didn't like the stack juggling and ended up using its macro assembler more and more, it became something else, conventions over code I suppose, like what to keep in registers. Forth (and Unix) got the composability requirement right, the testing of individual units.

I worked with Jason (creator of Om) at my last job. He's awesome!

A more explanatory article mentioned in the post: https://evincarofautumn.blogspot.com/2012/02/why-concatenati...

> any UTF-8 text (without byte-order marker) defines a valid Om program.

What is the behavior of a program with unmatched braces? I am not sure a stray `}` would fit any of the defined syntax.

https://www.om-language.com/index.html#language__syntax__

Another concatenative-ish one embedded in js .. just for fun - https://github.com/srikumarks/pjs

You may find the "genailang" module fun to play with.

Missing a 'g'!

Omg would have a ring to it.

I confused this with https://github.com/omcljs/om

[dead]

[flagged]

Will never not complain about languages not giving code examples. It’s like writing a charting/UI/style library and showing no examples. Just what?