Jury says Meta knowingly harmed children for profit, awarding landmark verdict
www.latimes.com - 267 poäng - 53 kommentarer - 14462 sekunder sedan
Kommentarer (16)
- nclin_ - 7763 sekunder sedan375 million awarded at $5000 per child harmed. Implying that only 75,000 children were harmed.
Got away with it again, good profit, will repeat.
- slazien - 5298 sekunder sedanWhy do we have prison sentences for insider trading, which is arguably (much) less harmful to the society, and not for this?
- CrzyLngPwd - 7714 sekunder sedanThe fine is just one of the costs of doing business for these megacorps.
- cedws - 8397 sekunder sedanWasn't Zuckerberg caught red handed in emails signing off on this? When is he going to be facing consequences?
- notnullorvoid - 5997 sekunder sedanAs usual the company is going to financially shield those responsible, while they in turn shield the company from societal blame.
- sayYayToLife - 6533 sekunder sedanDoes this mean Apple, Nintendo, and Disney are at risk too?
I would love to see some justice.
- maqnius - 8236 sekunder sedanTststs.. it's only allowed to harm adults and the environment for profit.
- billfor - 11973 sekunder sedanand also https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47514916 It might be good to roll all the comments together.
- xvxvx - 6166 sekunder sedanUntil the fines are large enough to impact business and cause heads to roll, and maybe we even see some prison time for executives, companies will continue to not give a fuck. This is chump change for Meta.
- jazzpush2 - 8619 sekunder sedanName and shame the managers and leadership at this time. I dream of a world where they'd be recognized and shamed in the streets for all the damage they've done to society. Instead they get to do all kinds of side quests with their money.
- awongh - 9556 sekunder sedanAs part of the ongoing enshittification of the internet, tragedy of the commons etc., these big centralized internet platforms decided that instead of being responsible and making their products *slightly* less terrible it was better to maximize short term engagement metrics, and that, egotistically, the chance of there being real consequences for their actions was near zero. (Or, even more cynically, that their yearly performance review was more important).
Now I'm afraid they've screwed everyone over and the idea of an anonymous open internet is now dead- we're gonna see age (read, real ID) verification gating on every site and app soon....
The dumb thing is to look back and see how umimportant it is that Facebook feed algorithm be this addictive. They already had the network effects and no real competitors. They could have just left it alone.
- - 8093 sekunder sedan
- WarcrimeActual - 11385 sekunder sedanI haven't read this article, but I can tell you for certain that no verdict was handed down that will punish them in any way that matters. They have and generate more money than they could ever spend and they're functionally above the law because of the money and lawyers they can afford. The law itself is broken in this country and when you get big enough you can literally get away with murder.
- jazz9k - 8369 sekunder sedanlol. And you think we will ever legalize drugs (and people can take responsibility), when large companies are being sued for being addicted to social media?
- ChrisArchitect - 13538 sekunder sedan
- - 7666 sekunder sedan
Nördnytt! 🤓