Two EA-18 fighter jets collide at Mountain Home airshow, pilots ejected safely
idahonews.com - 136 poäng - 114 kommentarer - 22972 sekunder sedan
Kommentarer (14)
- ak217 - 5702 sekunder sedanWhat are Growlers doing performing aerobatic maneuvers at air shows? They have tens of millions in specialized extra equipment on board. Seems like a poor use of taxpayer money. Send regular F-18s, not the rare expensive ones that look the same.
- Waterluvian - 18281 sekunder sedanI don’t know anything about anything but it feels kind of amazing that all four ejected with good looking parachutes given the orientation of the conglomerated plane.
- avalys - 18042 sekunder sedanThese are pretty expensive and specialized electronic warfare planes that are identical to a regular F18 in aerodynamic performance. Sucks to lose two of them for an airshow display. Isn’t that what the Blue Angels are for?
- yubblegum - 17228 sekunder sedanMy god that tv website is chockful of javascript from all over.
If you wish to avoid it: https://nitter.net/search?f=tweets&q=mountain+home+air
- arwhatever - 17486 sekunder sedanThat maneuver they were attempting looks WILD. Would have been amazing to have pulled of. Or, perhaps to have regularly pulled off until today. I'm guessing that must be some sort of vectored thrust trickery.
- Riany - 5405 sekunder sedanThat's good that all pilots ejected safely. But what if it fails? Still, losing two specialized aircraft during an airshow feels like very expensive, I doubt if it's really worth it to risks these pilots life on it
- booleanbetrayal - 4885 sekunder sedanSince the negative PR effects of exploding planes undermine the intended positive promotional aspects of conducting air shows, we should probably just halt and save money, right?
- Groxx - 17460 sekunder sedanIs there much of a way to recover from that kind of glomping? Kinda seems like the aerodynamics might hold them together (as the noses are somewhat pointed together), or with enough speed rip them apart chaotically since they're a bit skewed (which could be worse than ejecting early).
It seems pretty obvious that ejecting is the right choice either way, but it makes me wonder if there's any alternative in this kind of scenario.
- amelius - 17535 sekunder sedanI wonder how you can make the decision to eject in such a short timespan.
- gausswho - 17717 sekunder sedanWhat an odd collision. The way they remain in tandem after contact is uncanny, almost as though they were not under direct control.
- Thaxll - 17325 sekunder sedanOnce again, thanks Martin-Baker, 4 lives saved.
- - 17819 sekunder sedan
- ProAm - 9678 sekunder sedanI cant wait to pay for that with my tax dollars.
- momo26 - 2114 sekunder sedan[dead]
Nördnytt! 🤓