Uber, Lyft drivers in Massachusetts form first US ride-share union

The original impetus was more about banning robotaxis in Boston/MA than it is about the actual bargaining, from what I've heard. Just as the teamsters tried to ban cars to protect horse carriage drivers (that's what teamsters were, that's why they're called teamsters), they're back to ban the next mode of transportation.

If you were at any of the city council meetings where this topic was brought up it was a circus show with people repeating 'boston is a union town' and grilling waymo execs.

Good for them. These companies appear exploitative and rent-seeking far beyond what the infrastructure they provide suggests is reasonable.

If you're interested, next time you take a car, ask the driver what their end is - you may be surprised how little of the fare they actually take home. That share will only decrease unless they all get on one side of a table.

No doubt good for them, but I am curious how this is realistically going to work.

The barrier of entry to get new non-union drivers for Lyft and Uber is very low. If a strike does happen I can't imagine it would be hard for them to fairly quickly get new drivers, especially with the possibility of higher fairs due to high demand while it is sorted out. I have to imagine they would be able to get drivers far faster than most other situations with strikes.

I wonder if Uber and Lyft would even try to partner with gocurb or another app to funnel riders directly to taxies.

Not saying a union is a bad thing, I just wonder in this particular case how well it is realistically going to work out. Guess we will see.

I'm going to shout out Empower, it's a service like Uber that charges a flat fee to the driver every month, around 50 bucks, without taking any percentage fees, meaning both the riders save much more and drivers make much more, especially if they drive a lot.

Their rationale is that it should be more like hiring a contractor for your house, a platform wouldn't get a cut of the cost of your grass cutter so why should drivers be any different?

So far I haven't had any issues, although I did hear of some problems and controversies they have.

Unions are great when they are fighting for worker's rights by demanding things like businesses sharing their profits with the workers who make it for them, more vacation time, required investments in safety, and protecting workers from getting fired for having the wrong skin color.

But when they get into the business of slowing down technology adoption to protect workers, that's when they get into the territory of giving unions a bad name. Getting together to lobby the government to make systemic changes to help displaced workers would be great, but it seems in this case they are trying to get government to just ban technology that replaces them.

Good. All I can say is good. I wonder if Illinois or California would be next.

i'm so ready for fully self driving to take over

Given that Uber isn't their W-2 employer, what happens if they just ignores them? My guess is Uber invites them to walk off the job.

The end of driving as a profession is going to hit the economy hard. Teamsters may have the organizational strength and political influence to protect themselves. But they only represent ~20% of US truck drivers and none of the other ~3 million people who drive for a living in this country.

I don't see either American labor or American government being anywhere near strong enough or capable enough to facilitate a soft landing.

Good on 'em, but autonomous cars are on their way and it might displace the union.

In my city, Zoox are already rolling out driverless taxi services, and the vehicles they are using are completely autonomous.

amazing news, good for them