Danish Pension Blacklists SpaceX over 'Catastrophic Governance'

It's really concerning given how the indexes are changing rules to fast-track SpaceX being forced into index funds. S&P is also working on updates to S&P 500 to force it down everyone's throats quickly and algorithmically.

How can I transfer my shares of VTI for an interest in this pension fund, before it’s too late?

is anyone surprised? the IPO documents are a disaster, and the finance-tube talking heads are all tearing it to shreds

Any chance of bypassing the paywall? Does someone have a archive link perhaps?

Matt Levine described it well (https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/newsletters/2026-05-21/spa...)

> The deal, with SpaceX, is that Elon Musk runs it however he wants, and he does weird stuff, and you have to trust him, and if you don’t like it you can’t complain.

> When SpaceX acquired xAI a few months ago, did a special committee of independent directors approve the transaction? Did Musk recuse himself from negotiations? Was the price set by independent valuation experts using a rigorous process? Did outside shareholders sue to block the deal? Stop. Musk wanted SpaceX to buy xAI, so it did.

> [...] Surely SpaceX has created all that shareholder value more because Musk does what he wants than in spite of Musk doing what he wants; it is hard to accidentally create $1.75 trillion of value. SpaceX’s shareholders signed up for this deal — letting Musk cook — and have been rewarded;

Should have renamed the company xGoodwill.

Wouldn't the same argument apply against Tesla?

again, i’ve been posting this a lot recently, but i still think it’s worth sharing: it’s a summary of an academic paper i wrote, “it’s not finance, it’s your pensions” https://theloop.ecpr.eu/its-not-finance-its-your-pensions/

the piece explains how modern finance is de facto built on the shoulders of the privatization of the welfare state. i find it particularly relevant here: the finance class - in this case musk - wants pensioners money via mutual funds, even modifying the rules of indexing...

it’s not a great sight tbh.

prediction: SpaceX will not escape Earth's gravity. Meaning... what goes up will come down.

Good. Would love to buy SpaceX stock at a 90% discount after the IPO and the next tech / AI correction.

The part that gets me is that changing of the rules by exchanges and financial regulators to essentially force mass purchases on a small float. That's disgusting and in a just world, those people would go to jail.

The funny part of all this is that SpaceX has achieved a lot but what might break them, or at least weigh them down heavily, is the impulsive and forced purchase of Twitter. Before anyone claims it was some kind of master plan, Elon went to court to get out of it but was forced into it [1].

What happened? Mass firings, pushing his own tweets because his fragile ego couldn't handle Joe Biden getting more likes [2] and Twitter opened the floodgates for hate speech [3] and worse [4]. Advertisers fled. Fidelity (who foolishly was part of the acquisition) massively wrote down the value [5]. Elon had used Tesla shares as collateral and was possibly facing a margin call.

How did he get out of it? Well, in 2023 Elon founded xAI to challenge OpenAI. People invested in this for some reason. And by 2025, Elon merged Twitter with xAI, overvaluing Twitter at $33 billion (which is still down 25% from the purchase) [6].

Now, I imagine the xAI investors were unhappy with Elon using xAI to bail out himself so what did he do? Easy. Make SpaceX acquire xAI of course [7].

Thing is, xAI and Twitter/Grok are a massive drain on SpaceX's finances, losing more than $10 billion annually allegedly [8].

Twitter did not have to end up as part of SpaceX. SpaceX would've been a better company without it. SpaceX already faces headwinds from the incredibly expensive and behind-schedule Starship program. Part of all of this regulatory fixing is to make sure the insiders (and Elon himself) get bailed out.

It's also not the first time [9].

[1]: https://www.pbs.org/newshour/economy/elon-musk-offers-to-end...

[2]: https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2023/feb/15/elon-musk...

[3]: https://www.nytimes.com/2022/12/02/technology/twitter-hate-s...

[4]: https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2023/07/27/twitter...

[5]: https://www.axios.com/2023/10/29/fidelity-twitter-x-value-el...

[6]: https://www.fintechweekly.com/magazine/articles/xai-acquires...

[7]: https://www.reuters.com/business/musks-spacex-merge-with-xai...

[8]: https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2025-06-17/musk-s-xa...

[9]: https://www.theverge.com/2016/11/21/13698314/tesla-completes...

It’s obviously a scam. First xai acquires failing Twitter and then SpaceX acquires xai? At a made up valuation number that’s too high? The voting structure of SpaceX prevents Elon from ever being held accountable. Not to mention that the revenue and profits are simply not enough to justify the desired value.

[dead]

[flagged]

[flagged]

[flagged]