Anthropic employees accuse Trump administration of targeting them
- seviu - 4061 sekunder sedanAnthropic employees are right, but maybe this is for good. It certainly has opened my eyes.
I can’t rely on using a technology that the US administration can ban at will.
IMO without getting into personal thoughts about how capable the current US administration is, last Friday move sent a very powerful signal to the industry.
Also I don’t think China releasing so many good models, capable to compete with Opus 4.8 and GPT 5.5, all at once, is a coincidence.
- spelk - 3904 sekunder sedanOne wonders if this might be a net positive for the world if Anthropic is forced to terminate it's non-US citizen employees.
I would hope they return to their home countries with their expertise and start or join new competing frontier labs, similar to how Taiwan's homegrown semiconductor industry arose from US companies enforcing a bamboo ceiling on their Asian engineers. Taiwan was able to repatriate their nationals and make incredible compounding leaps in the semiconductor industry, to the loss and chagrin of the US. [1]
[1] https://www.npr.org/2022/10/07/1127595393/taiwan-miracle-sem...
- sailfast - 3613 sekunder sedanMisleading headline based on one off-hand slack comment and quotations from experts outside the firm.
- samlinnfer - 4329 sekunder sedanAnthropic is just the whipping boy. It keeps everyone else in line.
- amazingamazing - 4200 sekunder sedan> We’re proposing stronger regulation of the technology. We’re proposing giving the government the ability to, again in a narrow way, block deployment of unsafe technology.
Anthropic CEO https://abc7.com/post/anthropic-ceo-dario-amodei-calls-stron...
- ajju - 4484 sekunder sedanUnfortunately saying it in the press is going to make it even harder for them in the current environment. I know this administration gets non-trivial support from the valley, but what to most outsiders seems like "targeting businesses based on personal vibes" is going to do long-term harm to the U.S.
I hope those who represent technology in government, especially the AI head David Sacks are giving this due consideration.
- petilon - 4173 sekunder sedanThis shouldn't be a surprise to anyone following the news.
Trump has said broadcasters who allow criticism of him should lose their FCC broadcast licenses [1], demanded that "Bondi Move Now" to prosecute foes, ordered DOJ investigation of two first-term administration aides who criticized him.
Trump is doing this to members of congress (threat of primarying by Trump and Musk), judges (threat of impeachment and even the threat of eliminating federal courts that oppose him), law firms (threat of canceling federal contracts and security clearances), press and media (threat of banning from White House press pool, launching FCC investigations), etc. This atmosphere of fear and intimidation — of pretty much everyone — is the norm for this administration.
[1] https://www.nytimes.com/2025/09/18/us/politics/trump-fcc-lic...
[2] https://www.nytimes.com/2025/09/20/us/politics/trump-justice...
[3] https://www.politico.com/news/2025/04/09/donald-trump-retrib...
- tiahura - 3704 sekunder sedanIf you manage the corner coffeeshop, and the city health director calls with an urgent matter, you take the call and assure them you'll take care of it.
- Calgaryp - 4130 sekunder sedanThey just removed Fable in France
- etchalon - 4250 sekunder sedanThis administration is nothing if not petty.
- viccis - 4463 sekunder sedanAnthropic sowing: Hehe yeah guys check out this model it's super duper scary and powerful it's a huge deal
Anthropic reaping: Hey wait a second you weren't supposed to take that seriously it was just marketing :(
- martythemaniak - 3972 sekunder sedanYes, obviously. People really need to update their priors on how the US operates now. Laws are out, loyalty is in. There is an extraordinarily powerful unitary executive in whom the will of the people resides and it is the job of the government and society to work towards the will of this powerful executive. There are no checks or balances or alternative centres of power (civil, political, clerical, etc) allowed.
This particular executive loves money, praise, and submission. When Anthropic submits (eg agreeing to whatever the DoD demands), issues public praise and makes appropriate donations (eg ballroom, memecoin, etc), then they can do as they please.
Students of history will find this new MO very familiar and very depressing.
- seydor - 4115 sekunder sedanTrump vs anthropic
Elon vs openai
Trump vs elon
Bezos vs anthropic
When movie?
- andxor - 4324 sekunder sedanAnother opinion piece?
- catigula - 3984 sekunder sedanThey did a whole PR cycle about how dangerous their technology was. They refused to release it for public consumption.
How is this “targeting”? It’s literally what was requested.
- spullara - 4503 sekunder sedanAnthropic declares: "Mythos is too dangerous too release to the public" Proceeds to release Mythos plus safety guardrails as Fable. Amazon removes guardrails from Fable, getting access to Mythos. Government takes Anthropic's word for it and tells them to pull it until the guardrails can't be removed. They refuse. Government forces them.
- jimmydoe - 3732 sekunder sedanAnthropic should be nationalized, that should make everyone (except shareholders) happy.
Nördnytt! 🤓