First atmosphere found on Earth-like planet in habitable zone of distant star
- tulio_ribeiro - 3084 sekunder sedanDidn't know a rocky planet in the habitable zone of a red dwarf could retain atmosphere against intense stellar stripping.
Red dwarfs are known to be cooler (the habitable zone is therefore closer) and unstable.
I don't think LHS 1140b is "Earth-like" at all. Rather, it's more like a mini-Neptune, being boiled off by its star.
Edit: JWST emission spectroscopy of LHS 1140b as it passes behind its star rules out a mini-Neptune. https://arxiv.org/abs/2406.15136
- smb06 - 1600 sekunder sedanI feel like I've been hearing about atmosphere on Earth-like planets for a while. Or maybe I've missed some nuance.
- mekdoonggi - 18660 sekunder sedanWe should build a solar lens telescope. By the time we're ready to use it, we'll have a bunch of candidates to point it at.
- jimbokun - 20378 sekunder sedan48 light years is in our back yard.
Close enough that we could probably develop a probe to get there in the next few centuries and check it out. What are the current popular candidates for propulsion systems capable of accelerating to near the speed of light?
- de6u99er - 2032 sekunder sedanThere could be a second one (see at the end if this interview).
- kevthecoder - 16339 sekunder sedanRelated/dupe: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48939742 (45 comments)
- lucastamoios - 16038 sekunder sedan> The gas detected in the atmosphere is helium, which would not be able to support life, but other gasses may also be present.
Yeah, but not that much.
- dempedempe - 12596 sekunder sedan> Researchers have found the first atmosphere surrounding an Earth-like, rocky planet orbiting within the habitable zone of a distant star.
Well, if they observed not only a planet orbiting the star but also the planet's atmosphere, it must not be a very "distant" star.
- techteach00 - 7538 sekunder sedanWhat technology currently available combined with the best launch window, gravity assist etc exists? Might as well send a probe.
- throw4847285 - 3240 sekunder sedanI'm always so alienated (sorry) by the excitement around things like this. People start fantasizing about FTL and space arks and there is just no evidence that any of that is possible, desirable, effective, anything really.
I know I'm a killjoy, but I do think there's something negative about the impact of science fiction on engineers. Like, the people who tend (no offense) to be the most literal, black and white thinkers get exposed to art and instead of processing it as the output of human creativity, they start to imagine that it's desirable or even real.
- quotemstr - 5526 sekunder sedanKeep in mind that Venus is also an Earth-like planet with an atmosphere in the habitable zone of a sun-like star.
- danieltk76 - 11321 sekunder sedani do hope in my lifetime we find other animals on other planets
- kobelb - 3921 sekunder sedanlet's send elon there.
- OrvalWintermute - 2770 sekunder sedanThey found Planet X, Nibiru! :0
- bilsbie - 16918 sekunder sedanAm I understanding right? They detected an atmosphere but don’t know what it’s made of?
- astral_drama - 19873 sekunder sedanHow far will we peer into the unknown? What will we find out there?
- nobody9999 - 5709 sekunder sedanUnderlying paper from Science[0]
[0] https://www.science.org/content/article/astronomers-spot-fir...
- shevy-java - 5468 sekunder sedanThis whole search for life outside planet Earth is ... stupid.
Life is already on this planet. Why would it matter whether life exists outside of this planet or not? I mean, this is pointless. I understand that some have a financial motife to drive this narrative, but it is not logical. The counter argument is quite simple: IF there is no divine being, then ALL of life's complexity is logical and natural. So, it really does not matter WHERE it originates nor how many times. Why would it matter if it originated 10000x or only once? Now, I do not doubt that it has originated several times rather than once, but my point is that this extra-terrestrial search MAKES ABSOLUTELY NO SENSE AT ALL. That is not to say that research and exploration in space are pointless, but that it IS pointless to "search" for extraterrestrial life. Yet none in the media point that out. It's all as if it were some magical, mythical quest here.
- ck2 - 14518 sekunder sedanwe talked about this in great detail yesterday on HN with some fantastic comments
* https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48939742
NASA has a neat exoplanet catalog where you can also switch to its solar system view
* https://science.nasa.gov/exoplanet-catalog/lhs-1140-b/
Super-Earths are interesting but not technically habitable, at least not by humanoids, the gravity would be insane
There are new telescopes and techniques coming online really soon that can potentially find closer to Earth-sized planets but they probably won't be within 50 light years
adding: hmm maybe gravity not too horrible on 1140b but still INTENSE
(assuming Google's "AI" is correct)
> Gravity Formula: \frac{Mass}{Radius^2}\)Calculation: \(5.6 \div (1.73)^2 = 5.6 \div 2.9929 \approx 1.87\)
> if you weigh 150 lbs on Earth, you would weigh roughly 280.5 lbs on 1140b
- singpolyma3 - 19230 sekunder sedan> The gas detected in the atmosphere is helium, which would not be able to support life
Nonsense. You mean not able to support terrestrial life.
- mugivarra69 - 17949 sekunder sedan[dead]
- MattCruikshank - 16949 sekunder sedanSure, but keep in mind that technically New Jersey is "habitable," so don't get too excited.
Nördnytt! 🤓