Nördnytt! 🤓What Happened to HackerOne?
- Shank - 1641 sekunder sedan> To the companies: You don’t need HackerOne anymore. The tokens to build your own in-house platform cost less than single year of HackerOne.
You know, the biggest thing that HackerOne delivers is a universal payments system that requires absolutely no efforts from companies. Have you tried to manually pay hackers from around the world? It is a laborious process involving trying to find what providers are compatible and what forms of money go where. It is extremely taxing to handle this. HackerOne provides real, tangible value in not making people think about how precisely to pay a hacker and in what currency. No amount of tokens solve the accounting problem, and it is foolish to imply otherwise.
- paradox460 - 3860 sekunder sedanSending the sales team on a paid vacation to a tropical paradise while the engineering product flounders is such a perfect representation of corporate rot it sounds like something out of a Mike Judge movie
- tptacek - 3800 sekunder sedanNot only was there significant personal liability, but there had been multiple instances of hackers being criminally charged and sentenced to jail time for finding and reporting security vulnerabilities prior to this.
I don't think this is true, although it's a very commonly-held belief. Dan Goodin (I think?) wrote an article about this a long time ago, and was only able to come up with a few examples, and none of them fit this fact pattern.
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=16642155
What is true is that it is much less legally risky to test someone else's computer than it was 10-15 years ago. People forget that's what you're doing when you look for web vulns! The DOJ has had a norm over the past ~many years not to prosecute good-faith vulnerability research, even though strictly speaking it contravenes CFAA directly. But "risky on paper" is the most you could say about doing that kind of testing back in 2010.
- codexon - 3749 sekunder sedanI reported some exploits on hackerone.
Most got dismissed.
One of them, a remotely triggerable DoS vector got downgraded in severity. I got a token payment from the company, and 7 years later, it is still not marked as resolved.
I doubt my situation is unique.
- simpaticoder - 1864 sekunder sedanI don't understand the controversy at the heart of this post. H1 stated they don't use reports to train LLMs. Then they revealed they were using LLMs to triage reports based on previous reports. These two facts are not necessarily incompatible. It's entirely possible to use an LLM with a db tool installed to triage reports without using the body of the reports as training fodder. The article doesn't give any evidence that this was not the case. It sounds to me more like the OP already disliked H1 (for its sales practices and general enshittification) and the LLM issue was a convenient excuse to make a clean break.
- sudo_cowsay - 6606 sekunder sedanAll good things don't last forever. A organization or company lasting forever with the same goal/mission while using the same methods is a statistical anomaly.
- abofh - 5662 sekunder sedanIt got the executives it paid for
- grogenaut - 1376 sekunder sedanI'm sorry you don't know the difference between training, fine tuning, and context. But definitions matter especially in legalese.
- - 4923 sekunder sedan
- applfanboysbgon - 6023 sekunder sedan> Co-founder Michiel Prins was allowed to leave the HackerOne dungeon to perform damage control with this absolute banger of an AI slop response: [...]
Wow, it's like he prompted for the most stereotypically AI response possible. There's a tired trope in every sentence going on for four whole paragraphs! I originally quoted it too but thought better and decided to snip it out because I'm pretty sure it would get my account flagged by HN's AI detection algorithm...
- charcircuit - 5380 sekunder sedanI'm surprised someone could get upset at AI triaging of bugs which would save everyone time.