DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813
openrouter.ai - 275 poäng - 83 kommentarer - 7093 sekunder sedan
Kommentarer (14)
- scrlk - 4862 sekunder sedanBenchmarks:
Source: https://reddit.com/r/LocalLLaMA/comments/1vmi0fg/deepseek_v4...| Benchmark | DS-V4-Pro | DS-V4-Flash | DS-V4-Pro | DS-V4-Flash | GLM-5.2 | Kimi-K3 | Opus-4.8 | Fable 5 | | | 0813 | 0731 | Preview | Preview | | | | (w/ fallback) | |--------------------------|-----------|-------------|-----------|-------------|-----------|-----------|-----------|---------------| | HLE (wo/w tools) | 42.7/60.0 | 37.8/51.5 | 37.7/48.2 | 34.8/45.1 | 40.5/54.7 | 43.5/56.0 | 49.8/57.9 | 53.3/63.0 | | Terminal Bench 2.1 | 87.9 | 82.7 | 72.1 | 61.8 | 81.0 | 88.3 | 85.0 | 88.0 | | NL2Repo | 61.5 | 54.2 | 38.5 | 39.4 | 48.9 | - | 69.7 | - | | Cybergym | 83.3 | 76.7 | 52.7 | 38.7 | - | 80.0 | 78.3 | 83.1 | | DeepSWE | 62.7 | 54.4 | 12.8 | 7.3 | 46.2 | 67.5 | 58.0 | 70.0 | | Toolathlon-Verified | 74.1 | 70.3 | 55.9 | 49.7 | 59.9 | 76.5 | 76.2 | 77.9 | | Agents' Last Exam | 25.7 | 25.2 | 16.5 | 15.8 | 23.8 | 27.6 | 25.7 | - | | AutomationBench (Public) | 31.8 | 25.1 | 12.8 | 10.8 | 12.9 | 30.8 | 27.2 | 29.1 | | DSBench-FullStack | 71.1 | 68.7 | 41.8 | 37.0 | 61.8 | 73.7 | 71.6 | 77.2 | | DSBench-Hard | 67.2 | 59.6 | 31.1 | 25.8 | 54.5 | 63.0 | 71.7 | 68.3 | - alecsm - 2319 sekunder sedanI've been using the last Deepseek Flash update for a week and I'm amazed. It was a capable model for easy tasks but now it looks like it can do some heavy development for peanuts.
I can't wait to try this new one.
- jklmnopqrstuvw - 1694 sekunder sedanTested both DS v4 pro 0813 and Grok 4.6 (all from openrouter) on Codex cli. Worked on a same new feature development on my project.
Deepseek 4 pro: Worked for 12m 02s - cost $0.12 - has bug.
Grok 4.6: Worked for 3m 18s - cost $ 1.41 - no bug.
BTW, why grok 4.6 news being down voted and disappeared from frontpage?
- aabdi - 7011 sekunder sedanhttps://api-docs.deepseek.com/quick_start/pricing/
Competitive with opus 4.8 but weaker than sol or fable. About 20x cheaper.
- Gecko4072 - 4466 sekunder sedanCurrently burning money quickly on official deepseek api. They are also increasing pricing starting today. V4 Flash 0731 still feels like the most outstanding model of the past few months and probably to come.
- eshack94 - 1338 sekunder sedanIt appears that the only available endpoint (as of this writing) requires enabling "Allow paid endpoints that train on request data" in the OpenRouter privacy settings. I hope additional paid providers will become available that don't require training on data.
- indigodaddy - 5059 sekunder sedan@dang - Pls merge this with https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49274018
- book_mike - 3031 sekunder sedanWhat I care about is whether the model is capable of the tasks I give it at the lowest cost. Right now I'm using Kimi-K3/GLM-5.2/Minimax. Sonnet is great but I burn through the tokens too fast. Opus 5 set to max is amazing and more intelligent than all of us. .998 of the time I don't need that kind of intelligence. I just need the job done.
- nullbyte - 1005 sekunder sedanEven though cost-per-token is low, Deepseek v4 tends to burn an immense number of tokens to accomplish tasks.
- nthypes - 1863 sekunder sedanStill behind Kimi-K3 in almost half of the benchmarks
- Readerium - 2394 sekunder sedanV4 Pro has vision correct?
- - 6223 sekunder sedan
- LeonKnst - 4886 sekunder sedanI find it interesting how much adoption seems to be influenced by momentum. Some of these Chinese models are surprisingly capable, but developers often default to the models that are already established as the “industry standard
- yipinwong - 1903 sekunder sedanWorse than Luna but more expensive than Luna. Sticking with Luna without sending my data to Deepseek (China)
Nördnytt! 🤓