Nördnytt! 🤓Google Antigravity introduces Boost deep reasoning (/boost)
antigravity.google - 61 poäng - 39 kommentarer - 10152 sekunder sedan
Kommentarer (20)
- CSMastermind - 5263 sekunder sedanIt's impressive how badly Google has screwed up their models and coding products. There was a brief period of time I was using Anti-gravity as my daily driver when they first introduced it and then they just completely screwed it up.
- 1Kapish - 795 sekunder sedanI really wish Google can revive Antigravity with some serious upgrades.
- mystifyingpoi - 4402 sekunder sedanAll these /boost, ultracode and other magic incancations seem to be just "throw more money/tokens at the problem and maybe it helps".
- reilly3000 - 4206 sekunder sedanI had the same poor initial experience that others reported, but has anyone been paying for it recently and using it as a serious tool? Their new models are a pretty good value and crazy fast; I wonder if the Gemini on Antigravity output is overall competitive or has some niche use case other than being a frontend for Agent Substrate and their other projects
- nullmatrix - 3254 sekunder sedanMy experience with Antigravity is that it will tell me it's completed a task or implementation that it hasn't. Like, the work is half-mostly done but not.
- saagarjha - 5905 sekunder sedanJudging by this entire page being the direct output of an LLM with little editing done at all I assume the feature is probably half baked and probably just a bunch of skills or harness tweaks? In that case, why would anyone pay for this at all?
- dr_kiszonka - 5889 sekunder sedanI gave up on Antigravity when Google changed its rules around paid plans AI quotas, leading to my AI Pro getting depleted in up to four rounds.
Have they ever gotten around to fixing it or is Antigravity only feasible with their Ultra plan?
- hedgehog - 4754 sekunder sedanOn the one hand this kind of harness work is pretty interesting, on the other the blog post is light on details and sounds like existing behavior of any high end model in Claude Code, Pi, or one of the litany of other projects that people seem to be cooking up on a daily basis.
- eric_khun - 3771 sekunder sedanI have some super specialized workflow I wish I can run with their model, but looks like they don't allow programmatic call (claude code and codex allows it) in their plan.
- random3 - 4949 sekunder sedanI canceled my Ultra subscription after realizing I had Sol constantly fixing anything I tried to do with Antigravity. The most frustrating experience and a waste of money. I’m sorry for Google and hope they manage to fix their disaster.
- aniketsaurav18 - 6125 sekunder sedan> Plan availability: The /boost command is available on paid plans across Google Antigravity 2.0 and the Antigravity CLI.
They are ignoring antigravity IDE like it does not exist anymore.
- aboardRat4 - 2486 sekunder sedanWhich Boost version does it support?
- AbuAssar - 6596 sekunder sedanWhere is the updated gemini pro model?
- johnnyApplePRNG - 5332 sekunder sedanWhat's with all this AI spam for AI companies?! Seriously!?
Every single hour on HN it's OpenAI does this, Gemini does that.
It's all nothing.
Extra reasoning. Big whoop.
- soltanov - 6192 sekunder sedanis google fixed usage quota in antigravity? or still is this a problem of antigravity?
- Mond_ - 6286 sekunder sedanabsolutely crazy to make this a "paid tier user" feature.
the primary difference between the free and the paid versions should be the amount of inference quota you have access to
- pcuaron - 5549 sekunder sedanExcellent, so Gemini 3.7 can trash your codebase even faster (but seriously: don't trust this model)
- CuriouslyC - 5237 sekunder sedanAstroturfed post.
- nimchimpsky - 1720 sekunder sedan[dead]
- epsteingpt - 6491 sekunder sedanultracode... 3 months later?
Let's Go Let's Go Let's Go Let's Go Let's Go Let's Go Let's Go Let's Go Let's Go Let's Go Let's Go Let's Go Let's Go Let's Go Let's Go Let's Go Let's Go Let's Go Let's Go Let's Go!!!!!