F-Droid 2.0
- idle_zealot - 200 sekunder sedanIt's sad to see F-Droid using the now-standard design convention of categorically refusing to draw lines between things. No visual differentiation between sections of the UI, no clear indication of what's tappable and what will happen on a tap, no indication of scrollable areas beyond content being cut off. I'm willing to chalk some bad text alignment or uneven padding up to amateur designers working for free, but the design ethos on display, the thoughtless trend-chasing, is depressing to see.
- comex - 13836 sekunder sedanI notice that
is one of the first pieces of text in the first screenshot. With the k on its own line like that. Not usually something I’d comment on, but if you’re showing off a redesign…Syncthing-For k - silverbluep - 24525 sekunder sedanI have been using droid-ify on GrapheneOS for a few years now; because F-Droid ui is terrible, and the privilege extention has been such a pain to configure and get working without issues on my previous lineageOS phone. Happy to see this major overhaul; and i'm glad the FPE is being phased out.
- jjice - 23995 sekunder sedanWhat does the future of something like F-Droid look like once Google does their lock down next year?
- Muhammad523 - 11314 sekunder sedanFinally a submission at the top of the page that isnt about AI!
- opan - 824 sekunder sedanSearch not being a stupid floating button that occasionally disappears anymore is a huge improvement. Especially as it's the most important button.
- temphaaa - 20183 sekunder sedanCan someone recommend a good F/OSS ebook reader on F-Droid? The existing ones I have tested have too many knobs and options and are not really user-friendly.... My wife started to get into reading, but I could not get her to get out of the Kindle/Play Books ecosystem because of the user-friendliness and easy synchronisation across devices that Kindle gives.
- aorth - 24389 sekunder sedanCool! Unfortunately I switched to Obtanium a year or so ago. I get all my apps from GitHub releases straight from the developers now.
- rom1v - 23880 sekunder sedanIn addition to F-Droid on the device, I'd love an F-Droid "package manager client" on a computer, that allows installing apps on an Android device via adb:
Of course, all operations would verify the signatures first.# update repo lists fdr update # upgrade all apps on the connected device fdr upgrade # search packages fdr search vlc # lists org.videolan.vlc # install on the device fdr install org.mozilla.firefox # download the apk fdr download org.mozilla.firefox # uninstall fdr uninstall org.mozilla.firefox - outadoc - 24961 sekunder sedanVery cool, the visual redesign was very much needed and I had been using Droid-ify for a while because of this. I'll switch back to the official app, congrats to the contributors!
- Scene_Cast2 - 25123 sekunder sedanThe official page still downloads 1.23.2. I wonder when this will go live, and if the old app will auto-update.
- prima-facie - 23449 sekunder sedanAmazing news! I mainly use the F-droid Basic version which does automatic updating of apps. The regular one needs user confirmation for updates if I remember correctly.
- henearkr - 10765 sekunder sedanSince this made into HN first page, I've been trying to find the APK of this version 2.0...
Am I missing something stupid?
- hobo123 - 13550 sekunder sedanIs it not available yet? Fdroid doesn't update, and downloading and re installing leaves me with the usual app.
Still, excited for when it'll be ready.
- juiceland - 24832 sekunder sedanFor people who are die-hard F Droid users, do you get all your apps from it? I have tried in the past but it seemed like even when I restricted my use to basics it was missing things I needed to make my phone feel useful. Wonder if it has gotten better.
- AdmiralAsshat - 16172 sekunder sedanI hope the new redesign makes the store easier to navigate on TVs. It's a nightmare trying to install/update apps on F-Droid on either my Nvidia Shield Pro or my Onn 4K TV using the tv remote. The cursor gets lost all the time and it's often impossible to see what option is currently in focus when you click Ok on the remote.
- zephiel7 - 25236 sekunder sedanThis is very good to see. Classic F-Droid always seemed to fail at updating repos at least every week or so.
- mzajc - 24797 sekunder sedan> Also, F-Droid Privileged Extension (FPE) is not currently supported by 2.0. That means even if FPE is installed, F-Droid 2.0 won’t use it. This overhaul focused on full featured support for the Android “session” installer. That lets F-Droid run background updates on any recent Android version without requiring FPE. Like with any of the changes here, we welcome feedback.
This is a shame. Is the privileged extension a large maintenance burden?
- aargh_aargh - 20735 sekunder sedan
- amiga386 - 8607 sekunder sedanGreat! But why hasn't 2.0 installed automatically on all devices that already have F-Droid?
- go to F-Droid -> Updates. "Congratulations! Your apps are up to date."
- refresh the repositories. "Congratulations! Your apps are up to date."
- search directly for f-droid in apps. "This app was built for an older version of Android and cannot be updated automatically."
*facepalm* never change, F-Droid. You might not be able to automatically update the app because of Android API restrictions, but there's no reason your app can't tell me it knows there's an updated version I could be asked to apply manually, is there?
EDIT: it still says version 1.23.2 is "Suggested" even when 2.0 is installed. Perhaps this is a reason? Nonetheless, there's no setting to choose a different version policy, i.e. install 2.0 because it's newer, even if not "Suggested"
What does "Suggested" even mean? According to https://forum.f-droid.org/t/how-does-f-droid-suggest-a-versi... it's set manually by the person maintaining the metadata, which makes it even more of a facepalm if F-Droid are announcing 2.0 on their homepage but nobody set CurrenVersion=2.0 in their own metadata.
- Dwedit - 5684 sekunder sedanCan I finally block those bible apps?
- kmarc - 20853 sekunder sedanGreat visual and usability update.
Even greater HN conversation about all the to-me-unknown alternatives. I used neostore as a replacement, but maybe time to try f-Droid again
- einpoklum - 3348 sekunder sedan1. Nice! :-)
2. Please donate a few EUR/bucks to F-Droid! It's a good place to get Android apps from, and we can't all just mooch off of it. Doesn't have to be a big donation.
3. I am worried that Alpahbet/Google will kill these "unauthorized" apps soon, so that the new version arriving would be kind of bittersweet. Although - maybe I'll just need to switch to LineageOS or something.
- tukunjil - 14486 sekunder sedanNot any super user but about three/four months, I'm using my device without any google account. Also not using any G service apps such as mail/yt/maps and of course play store. Instead of play store I found aurora store very helpful. "Very" because of the anonymous login future. But sometimes the store disturbs. Newly added apps on Play store doesn't appears on aurora. Also many applications fails to be installed without showing any reason. Some shitty apps redirect to the play store app (which I'm unable to disable but uninstalled her! Updates) and just doesn't works anything more then redirecting me. So I'm still not a fan of Aurora. But it's going not bad. But sometimes I should browse other sites to get old/delated from Play store apps. Also for mod/adless version of some apps.
I heard of fdriod but what I think it may only serves feature less, low UI/UX optimized apps. So didn't installed it yet. But something should be available where people can find all Play store apps (as aurora supplies) + premium/adsense deleted modified apps (random website) + Open source apps (fdroid)…… this will make android insane
- parisiansam - 19502 sekunder sedanI wonder if FDroid has a policy against LLM? i was reading one of the MR here https://gitlab.com/fdroid/fdroidclient/-/merge_requests/1729 and they seem to gate on LLM contributions (and vibe coded android app)?
- Thev00d00 - 20390 sekunder sedanUrgh such a shame to be written by LLM
- 1970-01-01 - 16229 sekunder sedanFitting, as there really are only 2.0 trustworthy app stores for Android.
- cf100clunk - 25119 sekunder sedanThat page uses the term ''repository''' singular. Can additional repos be added in the way Neo Store allows?
- 97laos - 18300 sekunder sedanLove it new design fdroid basic really smooth in my ancient phone.
- magnat - 23985 sekunder sedanAnd still no popularity rating, download count or any user review system whatsoever.
- imzadi - 22613 sekunder sedanI wish they would add ratings or even just comments
- renszarv - 24848 sekunder sedanIf only they improve the AndroidTV experience a bit
- cyberax - 24048 sekunder sedanDear F-Droud, please stop redirecting me to the Mandarin version automatically without an option to read the original message. Just because I have a Chinese keyboard layout available.
- sharktheone - 18833 sekunder sedanso nice. FDroid always looked a bit dated to me
- Telaneo - 22185 sekunder sedanIt's nice to see F-Droid going places.
- - 24149 sekunder sedan
- imshaikot - 7836 sekunder sedan[dead]
- Kellyabia - 5002 sekunder sedan[dead]
- laruss5 - 21107 sekunder sedan[dead]
- Kellyabia - 4984 sekunder sedan[dead]
- hathym - 10091 sekunder sedan[dead]
- zb3 - 24897 sekunder sedan> All new code in this effort uses modern Android code standards and designs. This gives us a codebase that is easier to maintain, test, and easier to extend with new features in the future.
No, this increases the overall complexity of the system. Android will hopefully eventually collapse under its own weight.
- mightysashiman - 16905 sekunder sedanDid they implement any GrapheneOS security complaints for it to be deemed actually secure?
- 1vuio0pswjnm7 - 2268 sekunder sedan"F-Droid 2.0 now fetches and installs app updates by default."
Why not download source, (review, edit) and compile on the device, e.g., using Termux, Gradle and Android SDK utilities
Is "convenience" the rationale for the F-Droid app
Maybe it's the same rationale that drives Linux users toward "binary package managers"
It's too bad app source code generally isn't mirrored publicly like, e.g., BSD or Linux software, using the same public mirrors. (Many are run by universities, not corporations) If there are exceptions, the number of mirrors and the number of apps mirrorred is relatively small by comparison
The repositories, e.g., Github, etc., used to distribute app source code seem to be generally corporate-controlled. Termux packages are a welcome exception
Nördnytt! 🤓