16-bit Windows (Windows 1.x, 2.x, 3.0, 3.1, etc.) on 64-bit Windows
- londons_explore - 1401 sekunder sedanI really don't understand why Microsoft didn't build this when they released 64 bit windows.
16 bit windows wasn't complicated, and a simple VM and API translation layer could have kept compatibility going back 30+ years for not many engineering hours.
Yet instead they dropped 16 bit windows support and probably spent more engineering hours to support all the ancient software trying to update, and users who held back upgrading windows because they needed said ancient software, etc
- haunter - 5586 sekunder sedanInstalled MS Office 2.0 some months ago with it just for fun. It actually works pretty well apart from the dictionary files, for some reason those are not recognized
https://files.catbox.moe/dy4bqy.png
I’ve used it for a week just I was curious:
1, is it good enough for modern day to day word processing (mostly emails)? Yes it is
2, can the modern word processors (Office 365, LibreOffice, Google Docs) recognize and open the files created with it? (doc, rtf anything but plain text) Yes they can
- gabmartini - 10699 sekunder sedanNice, I will be able to play Civ2 on Windows 11!
In related news, with the latest WINE on Linux 16 bits/32 bits applications are supported, so I was able to run my beloved Civilization 2 without problems.
- yako21000 - 14331 sekunder sedanOh my good, windows 3.1x.... good old times and a word application that never crashed!
- devilfileprong - 4381 sekunder sedan[flagged]
- JanghoTan - 15185 sekunder sedan[flagged]
- orionblastar - 25842 sekunder sedanFinally, 16-bit Windows support for 64-bit Windows.
Nördnytt! 🤓